THE MARKET TODAY>>
MEDIA COVERAGE>>
FoQM Press releases
Useful quotes
Books & Publications
Challenges Ahead
Victory over the planners
London Plan Petition
Prominent Supporters
Newsletters & posters
Photos & Pictures
Queen's Market History
Educational Resource
Subscribe/ Feedback
How you can help
MAKE A DONATION
   
 

Joseph Rowntree and New Economic Foundation reports are but a few of the many studies and compilations looking into the effects of the St. Modwen development onto the historic Queen's Market.

Below are extracts from another recent book called 'Regenerating London' and sections from the Commission of Architecture & Built Environment (CABE) report of September 2008:


Photo: Dan Sayer (2004)

The disputed place of ethnic diversity: an ethnography of the redevelopment of a street market in East London

Section wrtten by Nick Dines


Introduction


Considerations on the position of markets in contemporary London  

It is a blustery but sunny Saturday afternoon in early December. Queens Market is packed with people going about their weekend shopping trips. The smells of fish, meat and coriander waft through the air as the solitary cries of traders are drowned out by the multilingual chatter. Four Black Caribbean men in their sixties hanging outside a kiosk taunt a fruit and veg trader about West Ham United’s latest plight in the Championship. Groups of Asian and African women chat as they rummage through rolls of material on a stall tended by two young white men. In front of the canopy a few people are collecting signatures to “save Queens Market”. One of them, a middle-aged Asian man, is relaying information in Hindi through a megaphone. Discarded empty boxes are littered around stalls and a number of plastic bags eddy in the aisles. In a quiet square adjoining the market, a few people are milling around a caravan belonging to a property development company. An exhibit has been erected displaying designs for a new complex featuring a superstore, a new market, shops and apartments. Leaflets are being handed out to the few passers-by, asking for their thoughts on the plans. Printed on the front of them are the words: “The New Queens Market. Towards a Safe, Clean, Vibrant and Lively Shopping and Living Environment”. [Field notes, December 2004]   Queens Market has operated next to Upton Park tube station in Newham, East London for just over a century (see figure x.1). Since 1968 the market has been located underneath a purpose-built, open-ended steel and concrete structure which currently houses eighty stalls trading four days a week as well as a series of independently run shops and kiosks (see figure x.2). Besides providing residents with cheap food and household goods, Queens Market has long been a focal point for minority groups, from East European Jews and Germans at the beginning of the twentieth century to the Caribbean and South Asian groups who started to arrive after the Second World War to more recent migrants such as West Africans and East Europeans.
 
The London Borough of Newham (LBN) has the highest non-white population of any local authority area in the United Kingdom. According to the 2001 census, 60.6% of its 237,900 residents were from Black and Minority Ethnic groups, compared to 7.9% nationally and 28.8% in London. In contrast to the neighbouring borough of Tower Hamlets with its large Bangladeshi population, the ethnic minority composition is extremely diverse. The principal ethnic groups are: Black African (13.1%); Indian (12.1%); Bangladeshi (8.8%); Pakistani (8.4%) and Black Caribbean (7.3%). The borough’s dense web of social networks and relatively cheap housing has meant that it remains a first point of arrival for refugees and migrants. Newham’s “super-diversity” (Vertovec 2006) is most vividly captured in Queens Market. Indeed, the market is often locally considered to be the “multicultural” hub of Newham on account of its particular history, the variety of ethnic products on sale, the mix of people who trade and shop there, and the fact that it lies at the geographical centre of the borough. In September 2004 the Labour-run local authority announced plans to demolish Queens Market and rearrange it within a new shopping precinct. Promoters of the scheme argue that the current market is unsafe and dirty as well as a drain on the council’s limited resources. Redevelopment of the site, to be financed and carried out by a private developer, would instead provide Newham residents with improved housing and retail facilities and at the same time attract new people and businesses to the borough. During the same period, an umbrella group called ‘Friends of Queens Market’ (FoQM), consisting of shoppers, traders, community organisations, opposition councillors and local political parties, has coordinated opposition to the scheme and has instead called for refurbishment to the existing structure. As well as emphasising its continuing popularity, campaigners have made a point of celebrating the particular cultural diversity of the current market. This, they feel, would be irrevocably lost in the event of redevelopment. The market offers a particular lens through which to explore struggles over the meaning and shape of public space in contemporary London. Until recently, scarce attention has been paid to street markets in the literature on regeneration in the UK. Yet markets have historically played a key role in British urban life as sites of commerce, consumption and social interaction (Watson and Studdert 2006). As distinct public spaces and crucial nodes in people’s social and economic networks, they have also been closely bound up with notions of place identity, particularly so in London (Sinclair 2006). However, as Stallybrass and White (1986) remind us, the market has held a somewhat equivocal position in the modern city:   “A marketplace is the epitome of local identity (often indeed it is what defined a place as more significant than surrounding communities) and the unsettling of that identity by the trade and traffic of goods from elsewhere. At the market centre of the polis we discover a commingling of categories usually kept separate and opposed: centre and periphery, inside and outside, stranger and local, commerce and festivity, high and low” (Stallybrass and White 1986, p.27).   This inherent promiscuity of the market can create feelings of anxiety by disturbing a sense of order (Sibley 1995), but may also be a source of attraction by providing a less regulated social realm than other spaces of the city. In addition, the market has traditionally been a politically ambivalent space; on the one hand functioning as an inclusive everyday public sphere, while on the other representing a place of petty bourgeois reaction and nostalgia (Watson and Wells 2005). The key question that needs to be asked is, if the market has constituted a particular experience at the city’s core, one that is both mundane and exceptional, what might its ‘regeneration’ entail? During the last two decades there has been a narrative about the decline of markets. Traditional markets have found themselves closed down, under threat or relocated outside urban centres, largely as a result of growing competition from superstores and out-of-town shopping malls and a lack of investment from local authorities which have redirected finances towards higher priorities such as housing and education (Watson and Studdert 2006). However, the idea of ‘decline’ is at the same time problematic. Conceived simply as a drop in customer footfall, it overlooks the ongoing, less tangible social role of markets. The term can also be used to simply express a negative evaluation which positions a market in relation to transformations that have occurred in a surrounding area. For example, Jane Jacobs discusses how the allure of the fruit and vegetable market in Spitalfields, East London swiftly diminished for new middle-class residents as its noise and clutter began to disturb their gentrified vision of turning the district into “a restored monument to early Georgian London” (Jacobs 1996, p.85). As such, the notion of ‘decline’ is employed to legitimate that other powerful metaphor, ‘regeneration’ (Furbey 1999). More recently there has been an equally insistent narrative of ‘revival’. The demise of street markets has been checked in the last decade by a growth in popularity of specialist and farmers’ markets, although these have tended to attract a more affluent public and have been unsuccessful in ethnically diverse parts of London (Watson and Studdert 2006)[1]. In order to revitalise trade, existing markets, such as Queens Crescent market in Gospel Oak and Broadway Market in Hackney, have begun introducing new stalls selling international gourmet foods and handicrafts in order to attract higher-income residents who have moved into the local area. This has sometimes given rise to tensions between ‘indigenous’ market users and newcomers around questions of cost and taste and, where increased popularity has attracted major property investors, has led to outright conflict, as in the case of the protracted ‘Battle of Broadway Market’ between 2005 and 2006 when residents and activists physically resisted the eviction of a local café owner  (Kunzru 2005; Iles and Seymour 2006). During this period of ‘decline’ and ‘revival’, urban policy has paid scant attention to street markets. Despite growing cross-departmental interest in the public realm under the Labour Government and the inclusion of markets in its planning agenda for town centres (ODPM 2005), there has been little emphasis on understanding how markets function as social spaces. In response to this policy gap, a number of recent studies have sought to highlight the benefits of markets; underlining, for instance, the opportunities they offer for social interaction and inclusion (Taylor et al. 2005; Dines et al. 2006; Watson and Studdert 2006). In a global metropolis like London, markets are seen to serve a diverse public and to act as entry points for new arrivals. As the authors of a report produced for the London Development Authority remarked, “markets create a sense of neighbourhood and social capital that can be difficult to find in London” (Taylor et al 2005, p.44). The reports have all called on local authorities to strengthen their support for markets by incorporating them within sustainable community, social inclusion and

[1] First established in 1997, by definition a farmers market in London is where producers from within 100 miles of the M25 motorway sell their produce direct to the public. Watson and Studdert note that part of the reason why attempts to introduce a farmer’s market in Tower Hamlets were unsuccessful was because the local Bengali population wanted to buy products from Bangladesh. (2006, p.32).

'Regenerating London' is available to buy from:

http://books.google.it/books?id=P3LJvdkJbC8C&dq=Regenerating+London+%2B+Imrie&printsec=frontcover&source=bl&ots=Y91YNKV_HH&sig=XRfc_dIUDBNMlZ3obxxrq-QO5k0&hl=it&ei=XhKlScOyIcOg_gaHv-2XBQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=4&ct=result

[**to be published in R. Imrie, L. Lees & M. Raco, eds, Regenerating London. Governance, Sustainability and Community in a Global City. London, Routledge, 2008.]


A Commission of Architecture & Built Environment (CABE) report in September 2008, detailed out some serious holes in the developers plans. Here are some sections of it:
 
Summary:
“Our primary concern is with the architectural expression of the market which lacks presence on Green Street. We also have concerns regarding permeability expected to be achieved through the retail diagram and its impact on the character of Queens Road and Rochester Avenue.”

Urban design:
“The lockable shops on these streets block the edges to give it an undesirable fortress-like appearance.” 

“Considering the demands of the brief, we feel that the aspirations for the level of animation on Queens Road and Rochester Avenue may be hampered by the current arrangement of retail units and entrances. Whilst there is potential to enliven Rochester Avenue with the introduction of town houses with individual entrances, we wonder if the entrances to residential cores will sufficiently populate Queens Road or encourage natural surveillance. Further analysis is required to ensure that the proposed character, design and treatment of both streets are based on a realistic understanding of the level of activity and movement pattern that is likely to be generated with the organisation of uses.”
 
Central block - Queens Market, open space and parking:
Queens Market is the key destination and ... we feel that it has not been celebrated enough in the form or architectural expression of this building. We think that the presence of the market on Green Street should be enhanced to give it more prominence.”

“We question if the proposed number of car parking spaces is perhaps too high for a town centre site. There could be additional benefits from reducing the size of both the parking floor plate and the open space in order to allow natural light through to the market below. The light wells, as drawn, may not bring in the amount of daylight that has been shown in some internal images.”

Tall buildings:
Tower “block one appears bulky and overbearing

Sustainability: “
As a large scale scheme including a mixture of uses, we would hope to see more ambitious sustainability targets. CABE's view is that tall buildings, given their high profile and impact, should set exemplary standards with regard to sustainability. We would expect a project of this size and significance to improve considerably on current building regulations.”