Tag: london-street-markets

Upcoming hustings: which candidate will truly stand up for Queen’s Market?

Do candidates mean what they say, or is the real story unfolding behind closed doors?

After more than twenty years of campaigning, our community street market is still sadly under threat. Friends of Queen’s Market have always depended on community strength and the goodwill of local residents, traders, and shoppers – and once again, we find ourselves at that familiar point in the political cycle.

Recent interviews with the main political parties suggest plans to demolish the market building. This would impact thousands of families who rely on it for affordable fresh food and as an important social space. Meanwhile, councillors based in more affluent parts of Newham seem disconnected from the realities of the cost-of-living crisis, all while being funded by the public. It raises an important question: who is holding them accountable, and are they truly serving the community?

You can watch the recent REVIVE FM Newham Mayoral Elections recording below [Queen’s Market is mentioned 1:07:50 onwards]:

Newham Council Elections – Community Hustings

Hear from the prospective candidates on the following dates (in-person gathering)

  1. Tuesday 28th April 2026 at 6.30pm
    Held at: Clapton Community Football Club, The Old Spotted Dog Ground, Walter Tull Way, 212 Upton Lane, London E7 9NP (Nearest stations: Forest Gate, Upton Park)
  1. Saturday 2nd May 2026 at 4pm
    Held at: Tate Institute, 1 Wythes Rd, London E16 2DN (Nearest station: London City Airport)
    Sign up to attend here: https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/newham-mayoral-community-hustings-tickets-1987663387699 
    Stalls and activities from 2pm. Hustings start 4pm. Finish 6:30pm. Food and kids activities provided 

    Groups involved: London Renters Union, The Magpie Project, Newham Muslim Forum, Respace, PEACH, The Women in Newham Network, Newham Trades Council, Save Newham Libraries, Born Everywhere Made in Newham, Friends of Queen’s Market and Newham Poetry Group and more TBA


FACTS about Newham show why residents need the market! 

–   The poverty rate is one of the highest in London: the market helps alleviate poverty.

–   45% of children are in families with below 60% of the average income: Queen’s Market provides for hungry families.

–   More households in temporary accommodation than most other boroughs (59 per 1000): vulnerable families need to eat, so come to shop at Queen’s Market.

–   Unemployment higher than average: the market provides jobs to heads of families, and for women too.

–   Life expectancy is lower than average: Queen’s Market provides access to fresh affordable culturally-appropriate food

Some Candidates are talking about ‘developing the market’. FACTS ALSO SHOW that property developers will not protect or safeguard the market for the future. Their business is PROFIT for themselves, not the wellbeing of Newham’s residents. Developers already own land all over Newham. 

WE NEED A MAYOR AND COUNCILLORS WHO will commit to PROTECTING the Market and what it is here for – no gentrification, no pushing local people and businesses out.    

Position of political parties

LABOUR – The Labour Council under Mayor Fiaz has not looked after the market or managed it well. Even with a £7 million grant, promises were not kept and the money has been spent very badly. The Council’s Local Plan puts tall buildings on the site – our market would not survive that.

NEWHAM INDEPENDENTS – Councillors Mehmood Mirza (Boleyn ward) and Sophia Naqvi (Plaistow North ward) have consistently supported Queen’s Market.

GREEN PARTY – Councillors Danny Keeling and Nate Higgins have supported Queen’s Market. Zoe Garbett (Green member in the London Assembly) has supported the market.

LIBERAL DEMOCRATS – Good ideas on democracy but their plans are uncertain.

CONSERVATIVE, REFORM – Regarding the market, their polices would most likely benefit developers, not residents.

FRIENDS OF QUEEN’S MARKET SAYS: “LABOUR HAS NOT LISTENED TO THE PEOPLE. LABOUR HAS IGNORED OUR NEEDS. THE COUNCIL MUST HAVE MORE VOICES AND BE MORE DEMOCRATIC. WE NEED A CHANGE.”

You couldn’t make it up!

What’s perhaps most concerning is that Newham’s former Labour mayor – often labelled by critics as overly controlling – has now aligned himself with the ‘far-right’ Reform UK party. Yes, that’s right, “Sir” Robin Wales (robbin’ us dry!), alongside Councillor Clive Furness, who is standing as the Reform mayoral candidate. Wales held power in Newham for 23 years, first as Leader of the Council from 1995 to 2002, and then as the directly elected Mayor from 2002 to 2018, until his deselection in March 2018. His ego clearly has the better of him, and he’s back under another ‘dodgy’ outfit. Many residents feel that the current challenges facing Newham are closely tied to decisions made during his leadership, with some of his former allies now seeking to return to positions of power.

Disturbing divisive politics from the far-right “weasels”: (Left-right) Clive Furness, “Sir” Robin Wales, and slippery national figure Nigel Farage, whose surname suggests his ancestry is foreign, but he does not want other hard-working people to call London, England or the United Kingdom home… seriously?!

“There is something rotten at the core of the main party politics inside of Newham. These people who have joined a ‘far-right’ political party while when in power (under Labour) ate greedily from the public pocket – from our collective taxes. It’s shocking that they feel they can get away with this kind of behaviour”, says Abdullah Isaiah born and bred East Londoner.

Pulling the wool over your eyes

Over the past few years, what we’ve observed in Newham is a pattern of superficial engagement – consultations and listening exercises that appear to invite collaboration, but in reality fall short of genuine co-creation. Instead of meaningful involvement, the process gives only the impression of participation while delivering the opposite. This is an illusion of democracy.

We ask people to walk around the post-2012 Olympic site and see for themselves – after 14 years, where are the homes local people can actually afford on the Olympics site? Where are the genuinely affordable shops? How much public money and investment is really reaching the community? Because from where we stand, those benefits are nowhere to be seen.

Image (above): “Don’t let them pull the wool over your eyes” is an idiom that means do not let someone trick, deceive, or hoodwink you. It advises someone to be cautious, pay attention, and not allow others to manipulate them or hide the truth.

FoQM say: when you go to vote, choose people power and change that truly protects our community and public spaces that hold the community together, like Queen’s Market.

Newham is London’s most diverse borough, and this moment will help determine whether the next generation can afford to stay – whether they can access homes promised as part of the post-Olympics legacy, and meet the everyday costs of living.

Queen’s Market celebrates diversity, unity and anti-racism, and has become a real litmus test for prospective candidates towards understanding Newham’s citizens: if they can’t commit to protecting it, what exactly are they standing for?

Image (above): FoQM remind you to bring along your photo ID when voting in-person.

Demonstration held outside Newham Council offices: “The devil is in the detail”

Council accused of playing ‘Hunger Games’ with local people’s lives

Friends of Queen’s Market (FoQM) would like to wish all our supporters a Happy New Year. We hope 2026 brings healthier choices, stronger communities, and many visits to Queen’s Market for fresh fruit and vegetables.

Newham Local Plan under review

Newham Council’s Local Plan is currently being examined by a UK Government Planning Inspector to assess whether it is “sound”. In principle, this process should ensure that local people’s needs, voices, and aspirations are fully reflected. In practice, many residents fear that decisions are being shaped behind closed doors, with private developers exerting disproportionate influence. Local people are left asking: how transparent are these discussions, and have all interests been properly declared? Public land and public assets should serve the public good – not be treated as commodities for private gain.

As one local resident put it, these suited decision-makers often behave as though local land and communities are theirs to dispose of. That mindset must be challenged.

FoQM raised serious concerns about wording within the Local Plan that threatens the future of Queen’s Market. Ambiguous language, buried deep in planning documents, could allow redevelopment that undermines the market’s social, cultural, and economic role.

PHOTO (top): on a cold blistering morning, ardent supporters and Friends of Queen’s Market demonstrate outside the hyper-corporate 1000 Dockside (another waste of public money – see: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-24205638), to stick up for local needs before private greed.

Growing frustration with Council conduct

FoQM and other community groups increasingly experience a lack of respect and transparency from the Council. There has been persistent vagueness about the market’s future, combined with reports of heavy-handed enforcement by market inspectors.

Residents are entitled to expect professionalism and accountability from public officers whose salaries are paid through public funds.

One long-standing mother with 3 kids said:

“For Goodness sake, the Council has the entire borough to play with. They have the whole post-2012 Olympic site in Stratford where luxury flats already dominate. Why are they so determined to destroy a historic community street market instead?”

“If council officers want high-end shopping, it’s only 15 minutes away by bus. Why threaten something that generations of families rely on and love?”

Newham’s financial crisis raises serious questions

Recent reports that Newham Council was on the brink of bankruptcy are deeply concerning. For the 2025/26 financial year, Newham received £51.2 million in Exceptional Financial Support (EFS) from central government.

This raises legitimate questions about governance, financial decision-making, and accountability. At a time of severe cuts to services, residents are right to ask how money is being managed and whose interests are being prioritised.

Related coverage:

When councils cut services, it is local people who suffer first – and local assets are often stripped away. Queen’s Market remains a vital lifeline: providing affordable food, clothing, and jobs for Newham’s diverse and growing population.

“Queen’s Market is affordable, welcoming, and essential. My neighbours from Stratford and my cousins from Essex shop here. We know the traders – they know us.

I don’t want over-wrapped, plastic-heavy supermarket food. Here I can touch the freshness of what I eat and feed my family properly. I also buy fabric to make clothes — the haberdashery here is unmatched.”

– local shopper who shops at Queen’s Market for 3 generations of his family

Read BBC article ‘How microplastics are infiltrating the food you eat’ [01/2023] on dangers of plastic getting into our food:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/future/article/20230103-how-plastic-is-getting-into-our-food

IMAGE (above): Source: medium.com/Lorenzo Viglietti

“The devil is in the detail”

The Local Plan contains language that appears neutral but may enable damaging outcomes. Terms like “affordable” and “retain” are frequently used in planning while meaning the opposite in practice – housing that people cannot afford, or demolition framed as preservation.

This echoes the English novelist, poet, essayist, journalist, and critic George Orwell’s warnings about political language. George Orwell viewed the changing, degradation, and intentional manipulation of language as a direct threat to intellectual freedom and democracy. He argued that when words lose their precise meaning, or are intentionally redefined to mean their opposite, they become tools for authoritarian control, enabling political “doublespeak” that masks reality. His most significant analysis on this topic is found in his 1946 essay “Politics and the English Language” and his dystopian novel Nineteen Eighty-Four.

PHOTO (above): Recent hoardings in Queen’s Square (also known as Hamara Ghar Square) promote “digital inclusion”, despite the Council knowing that its Co-create website has excluded thousands of local residents and wasted £3.1 million of public money.

FoQM and local supporters must navigate this complex planning terrain to prevent demolition and privatisation of Queen’s Market.

Have your say: Local Plan Examination

📍 Newham Council Offices, 1000 Dockside, E16 2QE
🚆 Nearest station: Royal Albert DLR

🗓 Thursday 22 January, from 2:00 pm
📌 Focus: Newham’s policy on Markets

More information on the Local Plan Examination:
https://www.newham.gov.uk/planning-development-conservation/newham-local-plan-examination

FoQM is calling for the removal of the Tall Buildings Zone designation, which would allow towers of up to 50 metres above Queen’s Market and Hamara Ghar. This directly contradicts other stated planning policies and must be corrected.

PHOTO (above): Highly corporate (dull), energy guzzler, over-budget, over-securitised – Newham Council offices at 1000 Dockside. Locals feel “locked out” of decision-making inside the London Borough of Newham.

Are local people being forced to just “survive”?

Image (above): Newham’s residents are increasingly seeing themselves in a dystopic episode of The Hunger Games

The Hunger Games (Book and film by author: Suzanne Collins) depicts a society where people must struggle, compete, and comply just to survive – while those in power remain insulated from the consequences.

Is this what life is becoming for Newham’s residents? A borough where communities are sidelined, essential assets threatened, and voices ignored?

FoQM believes Newham deserves better – and we will continue to stand up for Queen’s Market, for transparency, and for the people who make this borough what it is.

PHOTO (Above): Bureaucracy and red tape – Friends of Queen’s Market give counter evidence to the Planning Inspectorate on the importance of safeguarding Queen’s Market.